BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:10:54 +1200
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Wax Contamination
From:
Pav <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Organization:
BombusMaximus
Comments:
To: IrishBeekeepers List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Hi All

I am hearing claims here that Bayvarol causes less residues in beeswax than Apistan,
and further, that it is okay for use during the honey flow.

Can anyone tell me whether there truly ARE less residues with Bayvarol, given that both
are synthetic pyrethroids, and if so, what makes the difference?

-Pav, sceptical...




________________________________________________
  (\      Pav                                          [log in to unmask]
 {|||8-  Ahaura,  New Zealand
  (/      http://geocities.com/bombusmaximus/picpointer.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2