HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:21:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
I would submit Gaudi's buildings in Barcelona fall into that wonderful
"idiosyncratic" category.
Jim Sinclair
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Rotenstein" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: Above Ground Question


> Schuyler's question is interesting, however, he misuses the concept of
> "folk," putting it on a par with non-cultural phenomena at the opposite
end
> of a spectrum from what he described as "cultural-social."
>
> He is correct in dubbing some of the "attractions" in his notes
> "idiosyncratic," however that very term implies that the object/site is
not
> folk (or vernacular). In the world of professional folklore, folks
studying
> material culture often struggle with popular misconceptions that outsider
> art or self-taught art is folk art. It is not; it is idiosyncratic. The
> stone castles or pleasure gardens, including such places as artist Howard
> Finster's "Paradise Garden"
<http://www.finster.com/paradise%20gardens.htm>,
> carry a folk label but are actually not tied to any community or cultural
> tradition that the word folk implies.
>
> DSR.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2