HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Conner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:33:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Sorry John. It did cross my mind that you might mean that but I'm quitting
smoking today and replied too quickly.

Mike


on 1/22/01 12:03 PM, John White at [log in to unmask] wrote:

> Mike:  I was taken wrong.   All of the tests showed it did not work.
> John
>
> Michael Conner wrote:
>
>
> on 1/22/01 10:15 AM, John White at [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>> People there have been scientifc tests of dowsing!
>>
> Name one that has shown it works and give the journal reference. If you
>
> include the large German study, know that others have argued for serious
>
> flaws in its interpretation. http://www.csicop.org/si/9901/dowsing.html
> <http://www.csicop.org/si/9901/dowsing.html>
>
>
> For a look a dowsing experiment that didn't work and other takes on
> dowsing
> experiments look at these: http://www.randi.org/jr/08-20-2000.html
> <http://www.randi.org/jr/08-20-2000.html>
> http://www.randi.org/jr/09-17-2000.html
> <http://www.randi.org/jr/09-17-2000.html>
>
>
> Mike Conner
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2