My guru on digital imaging liked the Nikon Coolpix 950 above others -- I
assume -- without having asked him more recently -- that the follow on Nikon
would likewise be recommended.

I. Rovner
Binary Analytical


>From: Michael Conner <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Digital cameras again
>Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 11:25:44 -0600
>
>I know this has been discussed before, but I wanted to get an update on
>people's thinking on digital cameras as we are planning on buying one soon.
>No apologies for cross posting.
>
>The camera will have two main functions: artifact photos in the lab and
>building photos in the field. We don't plan on taking it to excavations on
>a
>regular basis, but will use it for architectural surveys and sometimes
>archaeological surveys. On the road we will be downloading to a Mac
>Powerbook, probably with an adapter that fits in a PCMCIA slot, and would
>prefer USB connection in the lab.
>
>The photos will be used mainly for  producing 4x6 to 5x7 black and white
>prints for use in reports or with building survey forms. They need to be
>200
>to 300 dpi for printing on a 600-1200 dpi laser printer. Occasional color
>work will also be done.
>
>Our photo services department recommends the Nikon Coolpix; they have a 950
>I have used, though we would probably go for the 990 if we get a Nikon. The
>main disadvantage I see with it is the expensive remote cable.
>
>Any thoughts on the Nikon or other types?
>
>Mike Conner
>
>
>===================================
>Dr. Michael Conner
>Assistant Director
>Center for Archaeological Research
>Southwest Missouri State University
>901 South National Ave.
>Springfield, MO 65804
>Office:417-836-6531
>Fax: 417-836-4772
>[log in to unmask]

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com