Christopher Rosevear:
>I notice no commentary from this admirable list on the desirability or
>otherwise of Malcolm Arnold's music, yet he is much recorded and has
>the great distinction of still being alive after 10 symphonies.
>
>Are his superimposed triads too much or too little?
Not recently, perhaps, but he has certainly received attention. Had
it not been for a computer upgrade that went less smoothly than I would
have wished (don't they always?), I'd intended to mention his 80th on 21
October.
10 symphonies? I know 9 that are numbered, and a symphony for brass. His
work list also includes a symphony for strings and a Toy Symphony, neither
of which I've heard.
Arnold is one of my favourite composers. I love his orchestration,
sometimes outrageous, but always involving for the listener. I'm attracted
to his wit and humour. I like those edgy themes with their hints of
menace. I listen carefully when, like Saint-Saens and George Lloyd, Arnold
introduces a theme that's just this side of corny, and triumphantly makes
it work. I admire a composer who can write a wholly delightful parody of
the dreadful school song many of us sang and professed to hate, but had a
sneaking affection for it nonetheless: this is for the films, The Belles
of St Trinian's and its sequels. Most of all I admire and love his seventh
symphony - angry, violent, and, in its second movement, as bleak and
unsettling a piece of music as I know. I don't know what a superimposed
triad is (could it be a British Rail station announcement?), but if Arnold
uses them, fine by me.
And a belated happy 80th!
Richard Pennycuick
[log in to unmask]
|