Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Ballad of Baby Doe
From:
Christopher Webber <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 May 2001 01:10:50 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Mitch Friedfeld writes:

>The program notes said that Baby Doe was one of the three most significant
>American operas, with Porgy and Bess and I can't remember the third.  My
>program notes seem to have disappeared; you'd think I'd know the third but
>I've forgotten.  Anyway, listmembers who are interested in tonal but
>different opera with a lot of catchy tunes will like Baby Doe, I'm sure.

Having been lucky enough to catch the London production a year or two
back, I heartily concur.  "Baby Doe" is surely amongst the best of American
operas, and to be frank in quite a different league from Gershwin's rickety
old chestnut.

Latouche's libretto for "Baby Doe" is excellent in every way, subtle
and yet direct; and Douglas Moore rose to the challenge with apposite
theatricality.  It's not all great music, but it is certainly a great
opera.

Christopher Webber,  Blackheath, London,  UK.
http://www.nashwan.demon.co.uk/zarzuela.htm
"ZARZUELA!"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV