BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Natural comb cell size
From:
Bob & Liz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 08:23:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Hello All,

Dee wrote:
Well, it certainly changed as they were upsized on artificial foundation Robert.

I agree with Dee on the above . 
One example:
I have seen queen excluders form 50 years ago which today's bees can not go through. The spacing was changed and is wider on today's U.S. queen excluders. 

Sincerely,
Bob Harrison

ATOM RSS1 RSS2