Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: resistance to tetracycline
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:35:16 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Peter Borst wrote:

> Yes. "Occam's razor" favors the simplest explanation: beekeepers have created
 resistant bacteria by dosing colonies with oxytetracyclene for 30 years.

I think it possible that we have been saved from resistance because we
have used the OTC in syrup solutions which are fairly ineffective.
They would leave a large proportion of non-resistant spores which
would outproduce the (presumably) less efficient organisms with the
superfluous resistance mechanism. When we got the patties which keep
the OTC effective for longer periods, the nonresistant organisms would
be wiped out leaving only the resistant ones to reproduce.

Best regards,

Donald Aitken
Edmonton Alberta Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV