Date: |
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 13:23:49 +0100 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The subject line reminded me of the magnificent opening line in one of my
favourite entries in Grove Opera: the biography of Tolstoy. It opens
thus:
Tolstoy, Lev [Leo] Nikolayevich
(b Yasnaya Polyana, 28 Aug/9 Sept 1828;
d Astapovo railway station, 7/20 Nov 1910).
Russian writer, distinguished hater of opera. He had some musical
education: he could play the piano after a fashion and even composed
waltzes. Sensitive not only to the pleasures of music but also to
its `hypnotic' influence and hence its power to uplift or corrupt,
he maintained that there could be no aesthetic judgment without an
ethical component. Good art was art that communicated simple ideas
and emotions directly and intelligibly, uniting artist and audience
in accord with Christian teachings. For Tolstoy opera, with its
mongrel mixture of media, its needless complexity, its irreality
and its reliance on flamboyant convention, epitomized the falsity of
art at its most debased and stood as metaphor for falsity in social
relations. The scene of Natasha Rostova's moral downfall in his
novel Voyna i mir (`War and Peace', 1869) is set fittingly against
the background of an opera performance ...
The article goes on to comment on the irony of Tolstoy's works
being used as the basis for operas. The author is Richard
Taruskin.
Mike Gibb
WWW: http://operabase.com/en
|
|
|