Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:27:20 EDT |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Pat wrote:
"Another reason to call a mom at home - what if you sent mom home feeding in an alternative manner (using shield, finger feeding, cup feeding) - doesn't the hospital realize they are out on a limb (legally) and sawing if they don't provide adequate follow-up. The whole idea of the hospital thinking follow up phone calls are a legal liability boggles my mind. I think "no" follow up phone calls is the liability issue!"
Pat, I agree and as I said, this is a huge problem in my community. But, I also think sending a bf baby home with a bottle also requires the same follow-up and should be thought of as a liability risk as well. If it isn't, then I can see hospitals choosing to limit supplement use to bottles to avoid liability.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|