HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:15:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Don't know the answer.  Might the particles discourage snow and ice
accumulations?





"David L. Browman" <[log in to unmask]>@asu.edu> on 10/04/2001
02:51:10 PM

Please respond to HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>

Sent by:  HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>


To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:
Subject:  Dark inclusions in sidewalks


Ron May's comment about the mandated inclusion of dark aggregate in
sidewalks gives rise to a question I have:

In several buildings in St. Louis, built as far as I can tell abround
100-1910, the concrete has mixed into it small particles of coal.  It
becomes particularly evident over time, as moisture gets into the coal,
causing it to expand, and ultimately force small spalls off.

I've asked several local current construction firms and architects:  why?

Does anyone out there have some sources to point me to, regarding why  in
a building dark inclusions were involved (particularly as this concrete
would, for the most part, not have been visible like the situation ron May
mentions).

dave browman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2