HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
john hyett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:45:11 -0800
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
ned heite wrote:

.........
> But, I submit, we all should be doing that. If we dig a church site,
> do we think of writing for the historical journal of that
> denomination? If we dig a site with tinsmithing remains, do we think
> of trade magazines like Tin International (which pays for articles,
> by the way)? If we dig a site associated with a family, do we hook up
> with the filiopietistic organization of that family's descendants?
> The list goes on.  There are billyuns and billyuns of direct
> associations that could be exploited for publication opportunities.
>

I agree with Ned here, what is the point of doing any archaeology at all
if we keep it all to ourselves? However I feel I may be taking coals to
Newcastle or trying to explain ice to Eskimos when I give the Australian
Blacksmiths Association (Victoria) a planned talk on the findings of my
thesis on a 20th century blacksmiths shop. But maybe I will learn more
than them, we will see!
John Hyett

ATOM RSS1 RSS2