BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:24:33 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> >and there were several other cells with dead larvae that had suffered
> chalk or some other problem, but the bees seemed to have the AFB under
> control.

> p. 45: “Shimanuki, et al. (1992) found that antibacterial material from
> chalkbrood mummies inhibited the growth of Melissococcus pluton and B.
> larvae. This material was subsequently identified as the fatty acid,
> linoleic acid (Feldlaufer et al. 1993)”

I was aware of this and that's actually why mentioned the CB.  I might also
mention we saw very little CB, but one factor explaining this is no doubt
the fact that the Lusbys have recently shaken all their hives onto
foundation.

allen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2