Denis

Mixed.

Rick

At 15:18 30-01-01 +1100, you wrote:
>Rick
>
>So, tell us what the conclusion was?????
>
>Denis
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 01/30 2:50 pm >>>
>With 82 (my count) dowsing items, no one will ever look at anything
>labelled dowsing again, hence the deceptive subject.  For those with an
>interest in an attempt at the scientific study of dowsing, see:
>
>Delmis L. Sonneson; 1989; Using the Conjectural Paradigm to Investigate
>Ancient Architectural Site Planning Techniques; Master of Architecture
>thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow.
>
>A small portion of the thesis compares the results of a magnetometer survey
>and dowsing on the same piece of land.  The sad thing was how long it took
>Del to find three faculty members willing to serve on his committee.
>
>Rick