HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gaye Nayton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:47:04 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
You could look at first Government House Sydney. That was discovered during
an urban development and is now part of the floor of a building. There is
nothing from WA. We have had two urban renewal projects and a tunnel which
have basically ignored archaeology. A third is just about to do the same.

I would like to see your paper when you have finished. We have changed
governments and the new government is reviewing the heritage law. It's the
right time to put any good ideas to them.

Gaye
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Carver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: urban archaeology


> i know i'll probably pester William Moss on this, but thought i might
> also solicit from a wider audience -
> i'm doing a paper in a course on the effects of globalisation on the
> urban fabric, offered by the planning department here in buffalo - i'd
> like to look at projects, ideas/thoughts/opinions, legislation,
> planning papers, etc., dealing with urban archaeology, specifically
> anything intending to integrate archaeological remains in
> redevelopment -
> any leads? suggestions?
> i haven't looked into this too deeply yet; i have some material from
> europe and will check out a few leads (among others, at least one MA
> course combining urban planning with archaeology), but i wanted to see
> what kind of resources i might have out there before i commited myself
> too deeply -
> i'd kind of like to tie this in with some of the international treaties
> and chartae and so on, which argue that cities should reflect their
> history and past by maintaining historical ground plans and property
> lines, and say archaeology might be seen as a defence against the bland
> kind of "americanisation" going on, which seems to be making every main
> street into a mirror image of main streets everywhere, and which sort
> of defeats the purpose of being able to travel (you go somewhere and
> it's just the same as being home) -
>
>
>
>
>
> geoff carver
> SUNY buffalo
> http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~gjcarver/
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2