BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David L. Green" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:16:42 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
In a message dated 1/19/01 9:26:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< Thank you to everyone who asked to see our last draft of comments on the=
  EPA bee labeling statement. We have read the suggestions we got back, and=
  made a few revisions. If anyone wants to see the final document that we=
  intend to submit on Monday, please contact me at [log in to unmask] and=
  I'll forward them on to you.
  >>

Matthew, I agree that regulations need to be stiffened not gutted. One issue
not addressed in current regulations nor in your paper is pollinator
remediation.
Those who misuse pesticides and damage pollinators should be required to
reestablish lost populations, just as stream polluters are often required to
restock killed fish.
I have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars from insecticides used in
violation of the label directions, and never have been paid a cent for
losses, nor have any steps ever been taken to restore damaged wild bees. This
should be required, even in cases of emergency, as these pollinators are one
of the most valuable environmental resources we have.

Dave Green
The Pollination Home Page:  http://pollinator.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2