Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:20:27 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Huestis,
With all due respect, I wonder if you read the whole message, including this
part:
>The phenotype of the Dark honeybee has not substantially changed,
>neither in the last millenium in Europe nor by transplantation to
>the southern hemisphere (Tasmania and New Zealand) during the last
>150 years. -- from "The Dark European Honey Bee" by Friedrich
>Ruttner, 1990
Ruttner is saying that *he measured* bees found preserved from a thousand
years ago, bees preserved from 150 years ago, and from today, and they are
not different in size. If there was a substantial downsizing in the past 100
years *don't you think he would have mentioned it?* Why would ne not mention
it? And please, I never said that bees were made bigger by foundation. I was
pointing to the fact the Apis mellifera mellifera, having evolved in cold
climates, has always been a fairly big bee, compared to African and Asian
types. (Note: Not all temperate bees are bigger, not all non European bees
are smaller. There are exceptions.)
pb
|
|
|