BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Generated by EnRoute for Newton)
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vernier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:07:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
So, let me get this straight, regressing is defined as reducing cell size
which has an effect on reducing worker body size? (at 0.2 mm increments)
which when combined over a generation or three will reduce varroa mite
population?  This sounds like an interesting biological control.  But
wouldn't the mite react in time?  What does the reduced cell volume equate
to honey or comb yield?

I'm confused?

Tony Vernier
Lurking microbiologist
(bees seem really big)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2