Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:41:13 -0500 |
Comments: |
RFC822 error: <W> DATE field duplicated. Last occurrence was
retained. |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> If life is a dream, who is the dreamer? To apply *think* to "conscious" is using Cartesian, limited thinking. To meditate *may* bring a sense of Consciousness closer. Like watching bees.
* What I meant was our conception of what it *means to be conscious* is just that: a conception (a thought). What it *actually means to be conscious* is another story, one where there is even less consensus.
>> Funny - to say we project human experience and descriptive terms on to bees does not imply the attribution is false. Like projecting on to other people - what we project may be true, even if less strongly than we think. There is something there to catch the projection.
* Exactly what I was saying. Simply because some projections are wrong, does not mean that they all are. But what I really meant was that it is OK to speculate about animal consciousness; in doing so we may approach the actual.
>> If you have a dog, you know pure gladness - how I would like
that much in my life!!
* If one has bees, one can also know gladness! I think that when it is sunny and hot and the nectar is flowing from heaven, they dance for joy.
|
|
|