BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Brenchley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 05:02:30 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
<Here in UK we have a destruction policy for AFB, absolutely no
<exceptions...There are
<many of us here that think this policy should be extended to EFB as well.>

    From my reading (I'm pretty new to beekeeping), EFB is a stress disease.
Melissococcus is endemic, and the disease appears in times when the larvae
are fed insufficiently. If this is correct, what purpose would be served by
burning EFB hives? An endemic bacillus will not be eliminated either by
treatment or by burning; wouldn't it be better to deal with an EFB hive by
identifying the cause of the stress and eliminating it? Or is my reasoning
cockeyed somewhere?

        I would totally support burning for AFB, but I wonder where the bees
come into contact with spores, given the pattern of sporadic isolated
outbreaks?

Regards,

Robert Brenchley

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2