Mats Norrman wrote:
>Why don't you try Pierre Boulez Mahler? He's great in Mahelr! Sounds
>exactly like Barbirolli....
Hang on a minute, Mats. Are you talking about JOHN Barbirolli? Because
Boulez's interpretations of Mahler are about as far from Barbirolli's as
it is possible to get.
Tony Duggan, England.
Mahler recordings survey:
http://www.musicweb.uk.net/Mahler/index.html