Richard Pennycuick ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>... I'm not sure when the Concertgebouw became known as the Royal
>Concertgebouw but it certainly wasn't known by that name in the 50s.
It was IIRC for their centenary - 1989?
>... I know the fine print will give recording dates, caveat emptor and
>so on, but it still seems faintly like sharp practice. Or am I just being
>pedantic?
If you are then so am I, because these things irritate me as well.
Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]