Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:33:12 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In my previous submittal of Part 3, I made a few "key" errors, obviously
not being sufficiently careful:
In the next to last paragraph, I noted "a good distribution of excellence
in the C minor Suite among the versions". That should read - B minor. C
minor was reviewed in Part 2.
I was totally out to lunch in the last paragraph. I said that Moroney was
fine in the D minor and great in the C minor - should read, "fine in the C
minor and great in the B minor". I also mentioned that I might have been
too hard on Moroney in the A minor; well, there is no A minor Suite - it's
the Suite no. 1 in D minor.
I had no idea I am "letter" challenged. With this insight now recognized,
I'll be more careful in the future. I would have been better off just
referring to them as Suites 1 through 6; a numbers challenge is less
debilitating.
Don Satz
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|