Michael Cooper wrote:

>I will venture to say I am not fond of Horowitz's Scriabin.  I submit that
>Horowitz formed a big part of how we listen to Scriabin, which we may not
>be as fond of if he had appeared in a later era.

I am neither an expert on Scriabin or Horowitz but I would love to
learn how we wouldn't have been as fond of the Horowitz interpretation
if Horowitz "had appeared in a later era.  I am reading your statement
correctly I hope? " Can you clarify.  Thank you.

Ed Beach