Steve Schwartz ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>... Besides, Stravinsky didn't change because he wanted to be
>"progressive." Or at least that wasn't the main reason. He changed
>because he felt he had worn out the style he was using. He felt written
>out. The adaptation of the serial technique in my opinion renewed him.
One might make similar remarks about late Copland.
Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]