MAR Knezevic wrote:

>Moreover, he would certainly be audacious in criticising a work that has
>been part of the standard-repetoire for the past century or so wouldn't
>you think?

No.  New ages, new performances, new times improve new perceptions, change
our minds and esthetical patterns.  New generations, with their new values,
and their cumulative knowledge see same Master-works different ways.  New
interpreters will make new approaches, to find a "self-stile" to identify
them selves, and that reveals new sides of the same Master Works that had
never been seen.  It's an historical matter.

Renato