Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Closing of bee labs.
From:
Blane White <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 07:39:40 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Hi Aaron and Everyone,

I too have heard that all but the Weslaco bee labs were not in the president's budget.  Don't know if it is an oversight or an attempt to actually close the other labs.  It strikes me as a real waste to close these labs now when they are so close to development of varroa resistant stocks of honey bees that can be used by beekeepers.  Of course they are involved in much other important work as well that would also be lost.  My sources say it is apparently true and the beekeeping industry in the US is aware and mobilizing.

FWIW

blane



******************************************
Blane White
MN Dept of Agriculture
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV