Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:15:30 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Both sides of the artifact-culling argument have strong cases, and to a
certain extent, I don't think it's helpful to apply overall strict
models; this is the sort of decision that surely should be decided on a
case by case basis.
If I can just play advocatus diaboli for a moment to the below post (and
this is me offering a considered point for debate rather than engaging
in one of my occasional rants)...
How do we know that the standards that we apply towards deciding which
artefacts are representative and/or interesting will be the same
standards that future archaeologists will apply towards making the same
decisions? Our discipline, after all, is not static and unchanging. Is
there not a risk that the choices we make when discarding finds will be
considered misguided and mistaken in the future? Perhaps more to the
point, since future archaeologists will almost certainly regard a goodly
portion of our research as misguided and mistaken (that, alas, is the
nature of the beast), is it a risk we're prepared to take? Just because
a piece of undecorated whiteware is uninteresting to us doesn't mean it
will necessarily be uninteresting to someone else in the future.
As noted, this is not me taking a position on one side or another, but
simply posing a question for debate.
> Some how I missed the original message on culling artefacts, but having read
> the last two messages I feel I have to put my come forth with my opinion. I
> have worked on both sides of the Pacific and am familiar with many curation
> facilities in the states and now here in Australia. All facilities now
> require a detailed catalogued of artefacts from a archaeological
> investigation. Why not just submit examples or a sample of each artefact
> type catalogued, not the whole collection. How many fragments of undecorated
> whiteware do we need? In this manner anyone who wishes to study the
> collection can look at the artefact types submitted and determine the
> criteria used by the original analyst.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alasdair Brooks
Department of Archaeology
University of York
King's Manor
York
YO1 7EP
England, UK
phone: 01904 433931
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The Buffalo tastes the same on both sides of the border"
Sitting Bull
|
|
|