Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jan 1999 07:12:03 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ulvi Yertsever quoted my nonsense from an earlier post:
>>If the number of symphonies a composer wrote is a prime consideration, then
>>Haydn is right on the money. There is always an excellent chance, given
>>the frighteningly rapid dissemination of information these days, that news
>>will shortly break about a find by some obscure musicologist in an even
>>more obscure castle in the depths of Moravia of the two hundred symphonies...
and with, apparently, some annoyance, wrote:
>Hopefully this was not intended to denigrate the symphonies of Haydn, most
>of which, despite their number, are masterpieces in the (classical) form.
Sorry if it gave that impression - I have the highest regard for them.
Several are on my reissue want list, including David Blum's magical Bach
Guild version of #60.
Richard Pennycuick
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|