Bill Walsh wrote:
>Obviously atonal (but equally simple) tunes were total failures. The
>authors were loathe to speculate much on the meaning of these results and
>noted that there was no scientific, objective way to measure a degree of
>atonality. Any thoughts on the philosphical implications for our struggles
>with atonality in classical music?
Philosophical implication: I am not a monkey. I love many so-called
'atonal' works.
Satoshi Akima
Sydney, Australia