BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 May 2000 08:54:03 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
John Burgess wrote:

> Neither Bayvarol nor Apistan are organophosphates, unlike Coumaphos.
> They are both classed as synthetic pyrethoids, and are regarded as
> significantly less hazardous to people than OP's.

John,

Yes, that's what we are led to believe. The point here is that I don't
think the
chemical companies told us about the sterilisation effect of these
substances
on drones either! Are any of the people around that they tested this on?

Robert Post - Editor CAPENSIS, Journal of the Cape Bee

ATOM RSS1 RSS2