HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ned heite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 May 2001 06:46:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Bill Liebeknecht wrote:
>Colonoware  has many definitions but I can say that in Trenton N.J. some was
found at the Old Barracks by Hunter Research Inc.

Bill has hit the heart of the matter.  For years, we have been
lumping all hand-built, low-fired, European-style domestic pottery
into this catch-all category.

In truth, "colono" is a broad category, with many local varieties,
from many different parent traditions.

There are European sources for this technology, and I am pretty sure
that we have seen "colono" pottery that was made by European
immigrants, using their own native traditions, without any influence
whatever from Native American or African sources.

Colono is a technique, not a ware.  And it is present in the European
culture that was brought here by our white ancestors.  There are
other colono wares that clearly are pure Native American products,
and others show African antecedents.

In America, after the first generations of contact, local "colono"
wares were developed with apparent creolization. But this process has
not been documented.

After years of debate (much of it ethnocentric), I doubt that we
really have a handle on this stuff.


--
*****[log in to unmask]******
*                      *
* Word of warning:     *
* Never believe any    *
* statement by any     *
* outfit with the word *
* "weather" in its     *
* name                 *
*                      *
************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2