HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"MacLeod, Heather" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:13:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Bravo Mr. Chase.
> ----------
> From:         [log in to unmask][SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
> Sent:         Tuesday, February 06, 2001 11:50 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Job solicitations
>
> Perhaps instead of lamenting the lack of expertise, unsolicited
> applications, and  insane thirst for employment on the part of job seekers
> you might throw a few arrows in the direction of the Colleges and
> Universities.  Colleges and Universities in general DO NOT, HAVE NOT, and
> WILL NOT prepare folks for employment in the CRM world, or employment in
> any world for that matter. In fact most often CRM is viewed, and discussed
> (if at all) as a rather low life, read lower life form, prostitution
> exercise. This was true in the Pleistocene when I was at the university
> and
> remains true today.
>
> CRM job seekers are trying to do what the books on finding a job tell them
> they should do. After all you don't have to reply or even read their
> applications. Give them a break. If anyone is at fault it would appear to
> rest squarely on several shoulders. It does make me smile when I hear that
> good qualified people are in very short supply and them we sit hear saying
> we don't want to hear from anyone unless I ask for you application. There
> is something wrong with that picture.
>
> In another regard it is rather silly to put forth Scotty's one line resume
> as the model and in the same breath to state if you were that good an
> archaeologist we would already know of you. I would submit that there are
> a
> goodly number of exceptional archaeologists that most of us have never
> heard of, read Flannery from years ago on this subject.
>
> Of course these views are my own.
>
> Jim Chase
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2