HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denis Gojak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:46:27 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Gaye

Yet another example of where Australian know-how has turned a obsolete,
redundant and quaint English word into a vibrant and effective noun.  See
also 'rort', 'mullock', 'bludger' and other words equally useful in
archaeological contexts.

Denis Gojak

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaye Nayton [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, 24 March 2000 0:23
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Arbitary Levels
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Salter <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, 23 March 2000 4:43
> Subject: Re: Arbitary Levels
>
>
> >Mark,
> >
> >It is a gardening term used in England to mean one spade's depth.
> >
> Really! How on earth did it get to Australian archaeology then. We have
> all
> been taught to dig in spits, meaning one excavation level between depth
> measurements whether the depth chosen is arbitary or stratigraphic.
>
> Gaye
>
>
>
>
> >On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:04:35 -0500 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Guys,
> >>
> >> Where did this word "spits" come from?  Absolutely unknown term to
> me...
> >> Granted I only work in the Great Lakes, but ...
> >>
> >> Mark Branstner
> >
> >Chris Salter
> >-------------------
> >[log in to unmask]
> >
> >Tel (44) 1865 283722   Office
> >              283741   Microprobe
> >FAX (44) 1865 848790
> >
> >Department of Materials,
> >Begbroke Science and Business Park,
> >Sandy Lane,
> >Yarnton,
> >Oxford
> >OX1 5PF
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2