Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2000 00:44:07 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve Schwartz wrote:
>>>I guess I'm saying that I don't see a categorical dislike in that
>>>controversy.
I replied
>>Perhaps, but you can find one in 17th century France in "la Guerre des
>>Bouffons" betwen partisans of French opera and those of Italian. Split
>>hairs with that one, Steve.
Steve countered:
>I accept your invitation. Is this war still going on?
Isn't time marching on for any contemporary conflict? In the year 2348,
today will be 348 years ago, and I doubt if the present "querelle" is
coherent enough or has aroused enough significant passion to shall have
rated a name in the musical history books of that future year. The 1752-54
War of the Buffoons actively engaged the likes of Rousseau and Diderot as
well as Rameau. Where are the comparable players today?
>Also, were there fights over where one or the other was actually music, or
>somehow in defiance of natural physical and physiological laws? Or was the
>fight simply over whether one form of opera was superior to the other?
I seem to recall Rameau's argument having a metaphysical and theological
bent. Wasn't it Rameau who said in his defense that he was the first to
have made a science of music by discovering its natural principle? Or was
he just the Al Gore of his time?
John Dalmas
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|