Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Wed, 17 May 2000 22:39:40 -0400
Subject:
Re: Barbirolli's Sibelius
From:
Jon Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
D. Stephen Heersink, discussing the various Sibelius cycles:

>Maazel used to be the recommendation to make to neophytes.

Maazel's 1, 4, and 7 continue to stun me.  The other four symphonies come
off horribly though, especially 6.  But at the price Maazel's well worth
it for those three high points.  From the reviews I suspect his later
Pittsburgh recording of 3 may have improved on the earlier one.  Meanwhile,
as one who can never resist adding to his Sibelius library, I'm probably
going to take your advice and get the Barbirolli and the Sanderling.  And
the recent Beecham BBC Legends issue-- damn that one looks good.

Jon Lewis
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV