HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:08:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Michael Striker schrieb:
> I wouldn't put too much stock in that map.  There's at least one site on
> there, Big Bone Lick, Kentucky, shown in the wrong place, with incorrect
> information.  There is no definitive evidence of Paleoindian occupation at
> the site.  Whenever I see something that I know is incorrect in supposedly
> reliable media, it makes me wonder about other information that I've gotten
> over the years!
>

i know the feeling - NG is a little too popular at times -

geoff carver
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2