Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Martha Stewart
From:
Barb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Barb <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Oct 2000 06:12:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
Enough on Martha!  I have been silent too long!  I would never have taken up beekeeping if I hadn't had the good fortune to meet someone who kept bees.  He let me help take honey from his one and only hive and that is what brought me to this place.  I wouldn't be surprised if the Martha Stewart Living episode some of you have been lambasting doesn't bring more people into the hobby.  

I doubt that Ulee's Gold had the same effect.   Am I to believe that because you keep bees as a livelihood  that you live in a shack, are lonely in love and have a wayward daughter?  None of that appeals to me.  There was nothing glamorous about that movie.  I would prefer that people think my hobby is "chic" than what was portrayed by Peter Fonda. 
 
As far as fine china and linens, Martha is providing instruction to women (and men) in the art of domestication.  An art that is sadly lacking in todays world.  

Sincerely,
B. Miller

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV