Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:28:44 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dave- Thank you for your assessment of the ECM's performance in the
Midwest. Would it be a reasonable assumption that in the low humidity,
cooler climate at Wingate this might not be as big a problem? Secondly
are you using facilities that have climate controls or ones that are
subject only to ambient conditions? Lastly, it seems to me that the
expansion of commercial warehousing in Flagstaff, Arizona because of
climate and transportation considerations (to market to population
centers in Southern Arizona and California) may have some relevance to
financial considerations for establishment or regional curatorial
facilities. -Mark
Mark Henderson
Ely, Nevada
David L. Browman wrote:
> Stephen, Mark
>
> About the "ECM" storage in your messages below, we actually are utilizing
> them for that purpose in St. Louis. The principal problem, however, is
> humidity control. In the high humidity of the Midwest, the concrete
> "sweats" excessively, and except for the initial price being 'right', I'd
> think in the long run it might be more economical to utilize a facility
> designed for records stroage, rather than trying to retro-fit an ECM.
>
> dave browman
>
|
|
|