Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:44:55 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Stephen Heersink wrote:
>Let me explain what I mean by "indelible" and why I think Haydn, as
>great a composer as he is, lacks indelible characteristics.
Stephen went on to note the large body of works Haydn composed, and that he
generally does not instantly recognize a Haydn work.
>This doesn't make Haydn any less significant or enjoyable, but it's
>rare I hear myself or others hum an indelible Haydn melody.
I think much of this has to do with a combination of liking a piece
of music and how familiar the listener is with the music. When I was
a youngster, I found it easy to recognize some of Haydn's symphonies such
as the "Surprise" and "Clock" symphonies. I liked them and heard them
frequently; they certainly have melodies that I find easy to remember
instantly. As an adult, I've grown quite attached to a few of Haydn's
mature piano sonatas; they are indelible as any other works I love. So,
love + intimacy = instant recognition (or a baby).
Don Satz
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|