Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:16:19 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Donald Satz <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>Jocelyn Wang responds to Bill Strother:
>
>>>Why can't anyone read what is written?
>>
>>That is a rather ironic complaint coming from someone who says he doesn't
>>mind if composers disregard a repeat sign that a composer has plainly
>>written.
>
>That's quite a stretch. Bill didn't say he wanted readers to repeat
>what he wrote, just read it carefully enough to understand it.
But he did gripe about people disregarding it. How about reading a score
carefully enough to heed those two lines and two dots that mean "Play that
last part again?"
>There is nothing wrong with Bill or anyone else not minding if performers
>omit repeat signs; the sky will not fall, nor will classical music suffer
>for it.
People can prefer whatever grabs them, but they should acknowledge
disregarding repeats for what it is:undermining the composer's intent,
and, yes, classical music does suffer for it.
-Jocelyn Wang
Culver Chamber Music Series
Come see our web page: www.bigfoot.com/~CulverMusic
|
|
|