CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 22:22:16 -0400
Subject:
From:
Margaret Mikulska <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
First, the practice of assigning opus numbers was not very common in
Mozart's times.  Only a handful of Mozart's works have opus numbers.

Second, Mozart is not really very special in this respect.  There is
practically no major or semi-major composer whose works haven't been
by now catalogued and in most cases assigned a catalog number.  Mozart's
cataloguer was L.  A.  von Koechel, that's why you see a "K".  The reasons
that using "K" is so common are:  1) there are so many of his works of the
same genre and key that some way of distinguishing one from another is
needed; 2) the Koechel catalog was probably the first scholarly catalog
(in the modern sense) of works of any composer; 3) Koechel's numbering
has been in common use for the last 160 years, and people got used to it.

Bach's works are nowadays preceded by "BWV", for instance; Haydn's by "Hob".

-Margaret

ATOM RSS1 RSS2