Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:34:56 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 12:00 AM 4/20/00 -0400, you wrote:
>I've only kept bees for five years so don't know anything about
>Jumbo Dadant Hives. Reading about them they seem like they would be easier
>to work and most beekeepers would only need one box for a brood chamber.
>Brother Adam used these at Buckfast Abbey.
> Why did they get discontinued?
Since no one responded to your question, I will. The frames were too big. A
regular sized frame can hold 5 or 6 pounds of honey and if it is not well
built, it will break. The bottom bar may pull off or the ears of the frames
may snap. This is especially a problem if the frames are old. I have no
idea how working the jumbo hives would be, but I imagine the frames would
be very awkward to remove.
Most people would rather have a smaller frame than a larger one. The ideal
hive is made of all deep supers. But for the sake of one's back, a
shallower super for honey is a very good idea. Also, if one uses deeps for
brood and shallows for honey (over an excluder), the chance of moving
apistan contaminated combs and honey around is significantly reduced.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Peter Borst
[log in to unmask]
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/plb6/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
|
|