Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Computers v. apidictor.
From:
Rex Boys <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2000 14:44:08 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Allen Dick asks if there is an upper limit to the accoustic spectrum.

Last week I interviewed a man who had spent his life doing sonar research.
Using piezo transducers he used frequencies up to 2Mhz for detecting fish!
I repeat 2 megahertz.

In some of his work he used scale models.  In a 6 foot long tank he used a
stickleback as a model for a cod!

My suggested definition for sound is, 'pressure waves that are detectable by
the human ear'.  One might add, 'or that of a sheepdog'.  Beyond this it
becomes ultrasonics

Rex Boys

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV