Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:58:24 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Donald Satz <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>Jocelyn Wang wrote:
>
>>And what information, other than the consent of the composer, would
>>justify eliminating repeats?
>
>I just can't see any requirement on the artist to "justify" the lack of
>observing repeats. The answer, so to speak, is in the performance, and
>each listener is free to make conclusions on a musical, ethical, and/or
>any other basis.
The performer does need to justify it, just as he would need to justify
playing fff where ppp was marked, accelerating during a marked ritardando,
or in any other instance of doing the exact opposite of the composer's
instructions. However, no such justifications have been offered, because
they do not exist.
-Jocelyn Wang
Culver Chamber Music Series
Come see our web page: www.bigfoot.com/~CulverMusic
|
|
|