Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: X/3 Time
From:
Dan Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:31:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]> writes:

>The distinction to be made is between meter and rhythm.  That there is
>in effect a rhythmic X/3 is a fact.  A time signature however refers not
>to rhythm, but to meter or measure.  As you point out, X/3 is measured as
>a triplet half-note in a 4/4 (or equivalent) bar.  For that matter, you
>could notate every waltz as triplets in duple meter, but very few people
>do.

I looked at a Morton Feldman score once, I forget which piece, and the
whole thing was notated as quarter-note quadruplets in a 3/4 meter.  I
think the intended effect was to throw the performer off so he didn't
perform it 'squarely'.

Dan Schmidt | http://www.dfan.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV