Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:18:13 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology Centers
Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related institutions.
*****************************************************************************
In the last two days several posts have expressed displeasure at the
evolution thread going on and on. As a result, I feel that people have
just trashed an issue that should be top of mind for science centers.
Is this the same reaction that scientists have, i.e. "It's so absurd,
bringing ID to the classroom, why discuss it?" Is it a feeling that the
issue of ID making inroads applies to schools and not to science
centers? The discussion was more information sharing and most emails
tended toward posting the latest news of the controversy, which I'll
admit does get overwhelming. Did people get tired of emails that failed
to offer ideas for addressing it specifically in science centers?
It's certainly easier to talk about floor surfacing materials, or other
questions with concrete answers (no pun intended), and definitely
relevant, but if 30% or more of the country believes in the literal
story of creation then science centers still haven't finished an
important education piece of the job and we need to beef up or change
what we are doing.
This choir has work to do. If teachers don't feel comfortable teaching
evolution, are science centers exhibits and classes picking up the
slack? If there are proponents out there of bringing faith-based
explanations into the classroom then perhaps we need to focus more on
teaching people not what evolution is but what the nature of science is
and the questions it can answer as well as the ones it cannot. That
serves a larger purpose than refuting the "alternate theory" of the
month. I think seriously considering how we convey the nature of
science is as important in the, pardon the phrase, evolution of
education through focus on inquiry. If we were already successful at
this, the polls would perhaps tell a different story or more people
would be embracing this as a theological discussion and not a
"scientific" one.
I think it is our job to think about these things and think hard about
them in whatever ways our particular roles bring us into contact with
content that shapes how people view the enterprise of science. I also
think it is our job to then do something in whatever capacity our roles
allow.
So what elements in your museum explicitly address the nature of
science? Has anyone done evaluations that seek to find out visitors'
concepts of the nature of science?
-Tinsley
-Tinsley Davis, M.S.
Education Associate
Museum of Science, Boston
***********************************************************************
More information about the Informal Science Education Network and the
Association of Science-Technology Centers may be found at http://www.astc.org.
To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
message SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|