Dear all: It has been a long time since I read the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy so some of you who have read it more recently may have a better recall. But the intensity of opinions offered lately about the scales have somehow brought the discussion of truth and beauty in that book to mind because the varied way we all perceive truth. Then I started wondering why our dicussions about particular methods or particular tools are so fraught with passion. Face it, we are a passionate group because we are in an uphill battle to win hearts and minds to the obvious fact that not breastfeeding entails huge risks to a vulnerable group that has no voice of its own: our infants. Not just our own personal infants, but the infants of our own species. But why the heated discussions about our internally divergent views that crop up again and again in the way we practice? Why do I look upon one tool as harmless as using a measuring cup in the kitchen with about a similar level of utility in cooking while others put it in the same category as unnecessary epidurals? For some reason, the book about Ice 9 by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. came to mine (again, it was long ago that I read it) but the basic story that I remember is an army colonel who is having problems with his troups and mud. Marching through it, vehicles stuck in it, mud is a huge problem. A scientist thinks he has the solution: Ice-9. It freezes water and fixes the problem because the vehicles can drive over the ice without getting stuck and troups can march over it without sinking into it. But the big hitch is that all the water in the world freezes - thus the end of the world. We are following an era when we put science on a pedestal. Science was as revered as it was in the Star Trek Next Generation series. That series always depicted the crew as supremely rational professionals who always came through with the right solution. Rational and professional won the day. Until, lo and behold the evil Borg - the cyborg products of that same rational professional scientific world who went awry, became evil and wanted to absorb all individuals with the admonishment that "you must comply". We had the era where science thought they could do better in telling us what to feed our infants. We were told giving human milk was "primative" and "messy" and "not as good as this scientifically derived mixture" and "you must comply". Now, too late, the consequences of this huge overconfidence in science in regards to infant feeding were totally wrong and science has proven it beyond reasonable doubt. La Leche League is what kept the flame or faith alive during the era of "science". I think about how religious faith was persecuted in China or seen as incompatible with science during the Sputnik era and how La Leche League has often been portrayed by the mainstream. La Leche League leaders have been unfairly called fanatic, Nazis and other horrible names when they should be revered for keeping breastfeeding going when no one else would. Similarly, there have been periods of existence when we have put religion on a pedestal. During the dark ages to question the hierarchy of the Catholic Church was to risk being burned at the stake. Scientists had to renounce their views about the world being round, the sun the center of the universe. Almost every religion I can think of has had periods where strife between competing views has lead to terrible and deadly wars. Yet both faith and science have contributed wonderful things to our world. Who can dispute the beauty of faith in performing spiritual transformations of the soul or the wonders of science that have enabled us to see into the stars and discover black holes and nebula - things of wonderous beauty and awe. Faith and science can be mutually enhancing and at times in direct conflict and opposition. It is neither faith nor science that are at fault when the gifts they offer are used to diminish or destroy. Faith and science are also both ways of comprehending our universe that can also be used to enhance, enrich and amaze. It is how we use faith and science in reflection to our universe that makes a difference. So I see our heated discussions as very similar to our struggle as humans to come to terms with our feelings about faith and science which often go through periods of intense dramatic tension, individuals, communities, cultures, countries. Which brings me to my favorite scifi series of the moment - Battlestar Galactica. The plot is that we created the Cylons who were our servents. They rebelled and wiped out most of us and we are at war. If you watch but one episode you will think you have figured out who are the "good guys" and who are the "bad guys". If you watch a different episode you might reach entirely different conclusions. If you keep watching you discover that every character has a rich complexity of good and evil. And least you think science fiction has everything to do with science hasnothing to do with religion - many of the good science fiction authors do struggle with various religious issues and the tension between science and religion. Battlestar Galactica is no different. So, don't stop at one episode in your world view. Keep watching. Ideas expand. Things change. Best regards, Susan Burger *********************************************** To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest) To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet All commands go to [log in to unmask] The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R) mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html