Just had to bring this up, re Kathy's mom who ended up weaning to get rid of severe mastitis, but was devastated about not being able to breastfeed. Being one to whom breastfeeding was important enough to go to great lengths to nurture and produce a partial milk supply for my adopted babies, I can really feel for this mom, and anyone else who has a such a strong desire to breastfeed. What I would suggest, in cases like this, or others that really require undesired weaning or not nursing in the first place (such as a lady I am in contact with who must undergo chemo for breast cancer as soon as her baby is born) is to plan on a return to the breast when it is safe to do so, even if that will be after many months. This would bear several similarities to situations where an adoptive mom wants to nurse a baby who is adopted beyond the newborn period. What I would recommend is that the mother who wants to return to breastfeeding first get started nursing the baby with the Lact-Aid (the SNS may be easier to use in clinical settings, but the Lact-Aid is easier for a mother to get set up to nurse with, many times a day, with no assistance from anyone else). Many moms feel much better just from being able to nurture their babies at their breast. Once a nursing relationship is established, the mom can just let her milk supply build as it may, from her baby's suckling alone, using the Lact-Aid as needed, or choose to do domperidone, herbs, etc.. I would be cautious with adding pumping to the mix, especially where a baby is willing to nurse. I believe in putting the emphasis on baby at the breast, rather than ounces of milk. For this reason, I also discourage the practice of putting off attempts to get baby to the breast, in order to try to get milk going beforehand. Although I believe that virtually any baby can be taught to accept comfort and food from the breast, with enough patience and creativity, it definitely tends to be easier, the younger the baby is, not to mention the fact that delays in getting baby to breast means letting precious time go by without the benefits of the nurturing (and usually some amount of breast milk), for both mom and baby. In a case where relactation can be planned in advance, I suggest taking steps to preserve breastfeeding behaviors, such as not inserting the bottle nipple into the mouth, but making baby open up first, switching arms in the middle of a feeding, skin to skin, etc.. With older adopted babies, the biggest hurdle is often to get the baby to accept being in a position facing right into the breast, so it is good to avoid having the baby become uncomfortable in this position in the first place. Bottlefeeding in as close to nursing position as possible is good, but can only come so close, unless mother has a hole in her chest for the bottle to go into. Other options are finger feeding, holding the finger in front of the breast, or feeding from a wide-based bottle nipple, which has a supplementer tube threaded through, sticking just barely through the hole. If the latter thing is done with a nipple that will hold its shape when baby sucks, without being attached to a bottle, and has only one hole, which is small and tight, the tube can be threaded through so that the baby will not suck air around it, but just get the supplement from the SNS or Lact-Aid. This way, mom can hold baby facing right into the breast. She can even lift up her shirt and expose her breast, positioning the bottle nipple right over her nipple. This is a trick I came up with to help get my daughter, Julia, converted from bottle to breast, which has since benefited many other adoptive moms with babies whom they adopted at an older age. I would hope that any mom who had a strong desire to nurse her baby, but was faced with a health problem that really required weaning would be informed that relactating is a very good option. Often, the bigger the challenge is, the more the mother and baby have to gain from nurturing at the breast, and whatever amount of breastmilk she is able to provide. Aloha, Darillyn "We had a mother with a similar scenario. Milk culture showed MRSA (methicillin resistant staph aureus). She was hospitalized for at least 10 days and was in severe pain, unable to even hold baby near her chest. Much as she wanted to breastfeed, she asked us finally to help her wean. Infectious disease specialists were afraid of any milk stasis so we very slowly, over several weeks, decreased pumping unitl she finally dried up. We felt if she did wean it was important to do it while she was still on antibiotics. She left the hospital, as I remember, on an oral vancomycin preparation. Of course she developed yeast also. She was never pain free until she had totally dried up. She was on antibiotics for weeks. We saw her every couple of days to support her through this and to help with the very slow weaning plan. She was devastated about not breastfeeding, but was not able to get on top of the mastitis while she was producing milk and couldn't even hold her baby. She had had several bouts of less severe mastitis before she was hospitalized with MRSA. She was probably receiving the wrong antibx until she was cultured in the Lactation Center. Kathy Boggs, RN,IBCLC" _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail *********************************************** To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest) To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet All commands go to [log in to unmask] The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM) mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html