LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:31:20 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Debbie writing, and quoting others, stated:

<< this would be very difficult to study, so many variables, a challenging
 project for experienced practitioners. these particular numbers reported at a
 conference by Neifert, were based on one particular research study (n=319)

 <<.....especially in North America, where hospital routines are capable of
 making even a woman capable of nursing triples "fail".>>

 in this particular study reported, "the preventable - often remediable -
 breastfeeding difficulties" were placed in a group: "secondary insufficient
 lactation", and =~11%
  >>

Is this the study in which if the baby did not gain at least 28 gm/day the
mother was determined to have insufficient milk supply?  So if the baby
gained only 25 gms/day or 26 gm/day, the mother was placed in that 11%.
Right?  Except the headlines that made Good Housekeeping & Time magazine were
15%.  So perhaps this is a different study?

Jan in Wheaton

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2